Home > Calendar > Osgoode Colloquium on Law, Religion & Social Thought and IFLS Seminar: Institutional or Individual: What is Religious Freedom in the United States Today?

Osgoode Colloquium on Law, Religion & Social Thought and IFLS Seminar: Institutional or Individual: What is Religious Freedom in the United States Today?

Date: 8-Mar-2017
Time: 12:30 PM - 02:00 PM
Location: Osgoode - Room 2027

In association with the Institute for Feminist Legal Studies and the Religion and Public Sphere Initiative at the University of Toronto, I am very pleased to invite you to the next session in the Osgoode Colloquium on Law, Religion & Social Thought, to be held on Wednesday, March 8, at 12:30-2 at Osgoode Hall law School, in the Faculty Common Room, room 2027. 

Prof. Leslie C. Griffin (Boyd School of Law, UNLV) will be presenting a paper entitled “Institutional or Individual: What is Religious Freedom in the United States Today?”.  Prof. Griffin is a constitutional scholar known for her interdisciplinary work in law and religion, with a particular focus on the interface of religious liberties, gender, and equality in the United States.  She is the author of numerous articles and book chapters about law, religion, politics and ethics, and her recent works include "A Word of Warning from A Woman: Arbitrary, Categorical, and Hidden Religious Exemptions Threaten LGBT Rights," 7 Ala. C.R. & C.L.L. Rev. 97 (2015) and "The Catholic Bishops vs. the Contraceptive Mandate," Religions 2015, 6, 1411–1432, available here. 


I hope that you can join us.  Lunch will be served.  

Please RSVP at www.osgoode.yorku.ca/research/rsvp 

---

This paper will argue that the U.S. government has usually interpreted religious freedom to protect institutions and frequently ignored the interests of religious individuals. Interpreting the Free Exercise Clause to protect religious institutions’ rights against their members ignores the experience of the earliest Americans. Allowing the courts to enforce a rule that automatically favors religious institutions over their members is at odds with the early history of liberty of conscience.


This talk will look at two examples of the courts privileging institutions over individuals. First, the ministerial exception allows church employees’ claims against their employers to be dismissed without lawsuit. Second, RFRA (the Religious Freedom Restoration Act) permits religious employers to deny full health insurance coverage to their employees.  The talk then explores the alternative, individual approach to law and religion, which the courts should favor in the future.


For more information please contact jrowe@osgoode.yorku.ca